Project goals and Objectives

The COWS project will investigate the potential of coherent detection as a means to improve coverage, mobility and data rate of indoor optical wireless systems. The poor link budget of conventional intensity modulation/direct detection (IM/DD) optical wireless systems necessitates the existence of a line-of-sight path between the transmitter and the receiver. This renders the link susceptible to obstacles such as people moving around the room, furniture, etc, reduces network coverage and limits user mobility. Coherent detection provides an inherent receiver gain and can therefore be used in order to detect signals carried from optical beams that do not originate rely on line‑ reflected from the walls or the ceiling of the room (diffuse propagation regime).

Due to the similarity of the coherent optical channel and the radio channel and more specifically the fact the optical phase information is retained, coherent detection can also open up intriguing possibilities for increasing the link capacity using multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) techniques. This is in contrast to IM/DD systems, where the phase information is lost and space time block coding schemes (STBC) are not very effective. COWS will investigate the applicability of MIMO techniques in coherent optical wireless links as a means to a) improve the capacity and b) improve the coverage of the system.

Besides the link budget, multipath dispersion is a major concern in the diffuse optical channel and can limit the achievable data rate due to intersymbol interference. Orthogonal frequency domain multiplexing (OFDM) can compensate the impulse response and increase the transmission bit rate. COWS will investigate the performance limitations imposed by the frequency selective channel and consider the enhancement brought about through the use of OFDM or other channel equalization techniques.

The objectives of the project are summarized below:

(a) COWS will provide valuable proof-of-concept on the applicability of coherent optical detection as a means to increase range, coverage and capacity of optical wireless systems which do not necessarily possess line-of-sight path between the transmitter and the receiver.

(b) COWS will investigate the performance of various equalization methods such as OFDM as a means to mitigate multipath dispersion and increase the transmission rate.

(c) COWS will undertake a thorough investigation of design parameters at a component and a system level (transceiver and local oscillator type, transmission wavelength, modulation level, predistortion techniques, etc). System design will take into account performance, cost and safety parameters.

(d) COWS will investigate multiple transmitter / multiple receiver (MIMO) techniques as a means to improve the overall link capacity and coverage.

(e) COWS will implement a coherent optical wireless testbed in order to ascertain the applicability of this technology in real world conditions.

Infrared optical wireless may provide one of the cornerstones of future local area networks since they combine a vast unregulated emission spectrum, multi gigabit-per-second data rates, zero radio interference and negligible biological tissue interaction. COWS attempts to add another two appealing features and namely enhanced coverage and mobility both achieved through the internal gain of the coherent receiver which can be used to detect signals even in the absence of a line-of-path. These extra features will enable optical wireless to become an ultra broadband successor of WiFi and a key technology for high speed local area networks, facilitating the penetration of broadband e-services and applications. COWS technology will provide fiber-like data rates in indoor environments without the need for installing new data cables. This is a crucial factor in home network installations, especially in existing dwellings where users like to avoid such costly and annoying tasks as much as possible. In addition the increased receiver sensitivity can be used to relax the transmission power, thereby leading to less power consumption by the optoelectronic circuits.

Short reach communications is another driver for COWS. Optical wireless can provide a wireless alternative to high speed wireline interfaces such as universal serial bus (USB) or fiber channel. One can envisage such systems providing point-to-point or point-to-multipoint connections and connecting several devices such as printers, laptop and television sets in a room. COWS can serve as a primary or backup connection in server racks and storage area networks. It can also provide a backbone for small to medium size computer clusters.

On a regional scale, COWS will allow the strengthening of the existing research work carried out at Harokopio University of Athens in the field of optical wireless technology and networks. The project will allow the hiring of experienced post‑doc researchers and the support of PhD students in order promote excellence in an emerging and rapidly progressing field of science and technology. Synergies with other optical wireless groups both in Greece and abroad will be sought. The COWS project is a first class opportunity to strengthen existing research collaborations and know-how exchange with top research groups such as the Fraunhofer Heinrich Hertz Institute, France Telecom, University of Oxford, etc. On the other hand, COWS will act as a vehicle to solidify the Greek optical wireless research community which is considerable which includes the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, the University of Athens and the University of Peloponnese.  

Existing Knowledge - Project innovation and originality

Optical Wireless Communications: Need and state-of-the-art

The proposed project deals with two of the most challenging contemporary research areas, namely broadband and wireless communication technologies. Very Fast Internet has been identified as the one of the 8 pillars for the Digital Europe 2020, reported by European Commission. Services ranging from high definition television to videoconferencing it is planned to use rely on much faster internet access than it is currently available in Europe. In order to compete with world leaders like South Korea and Japan, Europe aims to download rates of 30 Mbps for all of its citizens and at least 50% internet connections at least 100 Mbps for all European households by 2020. In this direction, among the EC planned actions is the adaption of an EU broadband communication, funding for high-speed broadband, and facilitation of broadband investment by the member states. In order to enter this new fast internet era broadband and wireless communication are key enabling technologies. It comes as no surprise that during the first assembly for the digital agenda 2020 [1], two of the workshops that took place were dedicated to such technologies. More precisely, the “Spectrum for wireless innovation in Europe” [2] and the “Financing and facilitating broadband projects” workshops have gained the attendees attention [3].

Figure 1 shows the evolution of data transmission technologies, either wireless or wireline in the access and home network. It is easily seen that gigabit-per-second can be supported up to the customer premises using optical fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) access technologies like gigabit passive optical networks (GPON) [4],[5]. The figure also suggests that radio-based wireless technologies such as 802.11n and ultra wide band (UWB) cannot achieve gigabit-per-second connectivity at the customer premises. Various alternatives to WiFi are currently being sought. Wired alternatives include multimode or plastic fiber systems, power line communications and unshielded twisted pair (UTP) Ethernet. Wireline alternatives can lead to the well known cable “spaghetti” (mixing of cables) which must be avoided in domestic environmenents for both practical and aesthetic reasons. They also provided limited user mobility compared to wireless alternatives. The fiber-based alternatives provide very high data rates [6] but need to be installed from scratch in existing dwellings, implying increased cost and user discomfort. This is also true for UTP-based Ethernet which operate at lower data rates and smaller distances. Power line communications [7] use the existing power cables but are generally limited to data rates below 1Gb/s. Wireless technologies currently being pursued include 60GHz millimeter-wave [8] and terahertz systems [9]. 60GHz systems take advantage of the 57-64GHz unlicenced RF spectrum . Low power 60GHz transceivers have been implemented operating at 3.5Gb/s on a standard CMOS platform [8]. Similar data rates can be achieved at the THz spectrum using a resonant tunneling diode transmitter [9]. Both systems rely on a line-of-sight path between the transmitter and the receiver, unlike conventional 802.11 networks.

Another alternative is to use optical wireless technology, which in essence means transmitting light signals without any waveguiding medium such as an optical fiber. Taking advantage of the significant technical know-how in optical transceivers, line-of-sight indoor optical wireless systems operating at the infrared regime can support 10Gb/s data rates [11]. Since the infrared communication spectrum is practically unlimited (0.7μm-1.6μm), it is possible to envision a multitude of optical wireless systems operating in the same room transmitting at a different wavelength. Besides the vast available spectrum and the large data rates, optical wireless systems exhibit zero interference with existing radio systems and provided some eye safety precautions are met, optical wireless are known to have negligible biological interaction, unlike THz or 60GHz radiation where this still remains a much debated subject. Outdoor optical wireless links, a.k.a. free space optical systems have already been commercialized and can support multigigabit connectivity. In indoor environments, optical wireless systems are also being considered for high bandwidth connectivity.

Figure 1: The evolution of access technologies (source: Orange Labs white paper)

Optical wireless systems usually consist of transceivers operating at the infrared (IR) part of the spectrum. Figure 2 illustrates four different variations of the two basic transmitter/receiver arrangements. Figure 2(a) depicts a truly diffuse system, where no direct line-of-sight path exists and communication is achieved through beam reflections at the various surfaces of the room (walls, ceiling, etc). Figure 2(b) depicts a quasi diffuse arrangement. The transmitter points towards the ceiling and the terminals are illuminated through reflection of the beam through the ceiling or some other reflecting surface. Figure 2(c) shows a wide line-of-sight system (WLOS), where the transmitter beam is wide enough to cover a relatively large portion of the room. Figure 2(d) is a narrow line of sight (NLOS) system, where the transmitter beam is narrow and covers only a small portion of the room.

                                 

Figure 2: Various IR transmitter/receiver configurations

Diffuse and quasi diffuse systems have a stringent link budget since light reaches the receiver through (possibly) multiple reflections which significantly attenuate the signal strength. In addition, there can be more than one optical paths, giving rise to multipath dispersion, corresponding to a frequency selective channel. At high data rates, this implies intersymbol interference (ISI) which can significantly degrade the achievable bit error rate (BER) at the receiver side [4]. Quasi diffuse links are usually less impaired by ISI than diffuse links. Multipath dispersion can be present in WLOS as well. The fact that the beam is wide enough may result in portions of the signal arriving after a single or multiple reflections at the various surfaces of the room. In NLOS systems, multipath fading is negligible and the link budget poses less stringent restrictions on transmitter optical power. LOS configurations are susceptible to blocking from various obstacles which can accidentally interrupt the line-of-sight path. Diffuse links, are more robust, since they do not rely on line-of-sight.

The first IR system was demonstrated by Gfeller and Bapst [10] and was a diffuse link operating at 1Mbit/s. A diffuse system operating at 50Mbit/s was later demonstrated using IM/DD [11]. In later demonstrations and because of the multipath dispersion and the poor link budget which limit the system performance, attention has recently been shifted towards line-of-sight systems. Recently, the ICT-OMEGA project demonstrated a multiple element transceiver operating at 1.25Gbit/s [12] using low-cost commercial of the shelf components. Recently  12.5Gb/s connectivity has been demonstrated with the signal being fed by a remote central office node (~6Km distance) without any optoelectronic conversion at the room hotspot [13].

Coherent detection in optical communications

From the perspective of coherent optical detection in optical communications, the first wave of the intense interest appeared in the 1980s and early 1990s, when the coherent detection was viewed as a promising technique to improve the receiver sensitivity [14]. The earlier incarnations of coherent receivers were complicated, and typically included high speed analog electronics for demodulation from the carrier or for optical phase locking, and also active optical components for polarization control. However, the ensuing invention of the erbium doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) reduced research on coherent communication to peripheral interest. Recent years have seen a revival of coherent detection schemes in fiber-based systems where the bandwidth constraints of optical amplifier and ultimately the fiber itself, it is important to maximize the spectral efficiency but at the same time keep the transmitted power low enough in order to prevent signal-to-noise ratio degradation due to fiber nonlinearity [15]. In optical wireless communications where small size, low cost components are needed, the use of optical amplifiers such as EDFAs or semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOA) is prohibited. In recent implementations of coherent receiver, the functionalities of phase locking and polarization control are performed in the digital domain using digital signal processing (DSP). Provided that the DSP hardware and also the necessary optical passive components can be produced in volume at low cost, the new version of the coherent receiver will be cost-effective compared to direct detection, and is likely to be widely deployed.

To compensate for the effect of the frequency selective channel, equalization methods such as OFDM can be applied. OFDM has emerged as the leading physical-layer interface in wireless communications in the past decade. It is a special form of a broader class of multicarrier modulation where a data stream is carried with many lower-rate subcarrier tones [16]. OFDM has been widely studied in mobile communications to combat hostile frequency-selective fading and has been incorporated into wireless network standards (802.11a/g WiFi, HiperLAN2, 802.16 WiMAX) and digital audio and video broadcasting (DAB and DVB-T) in Europe, Asia, Australia, and other parts of the world. The synergies between coherent optical communications and OFDM are twofold. The coherent system brings OFDM a much needed linearity in RF-to-optical (RTO) upconversion and optical-to-RF (OTR) downconversion. OFDM brings coherent system computation efficiency and ease of channel and phase estimation. The complementary metal–oxide semiconductor (CMOS) application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips recently demonstrated for single carrier coherent systems [17] signify that the current silicon speed can support 40 Gbit/s OFDM transmission systems. Because of its superior scalability with the bit rate of the transmission systems, coherent OFDM (CO-OFDM) is well-positioned to be an attractive choice of modulation format for the next generation of 100 Gbit/s wireline transmission.

The COWS approach: Bringing coherent detection in the optical wireless realm.

The above points illustrate the potential advantages of CO-OFDM in diffuse optical wireless links. The inherent internal gain of the coherent receiver offers a promising alternative for improving the link budget. OFDM can be used to provide channel equalization and mitigate the frequency selective nature of the diffuse optical wireless channel. Figure 3 shows the COWS link which takes advantage of both technologies in order to combine the optical wireless high data rates with the mobility and room coverage of a Wi‑fi network.  

As seen in the figure, the input data pass through a serial to parallel converter and then to a subcarrier symbol mapper, which maps the incoming bits to transmitted symbols. The symbol stream the pass though an inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDF) which estimates the OFDM waveform samples. A guard interval (GI) is inserted in order to ensure that subsequent symbols do not interfere. The digital-to-analog converters (D/A) converters synthesize the real (Re) and the imaginary (Im) part of the ODFM waveform which is fed to the Mach-Zehnder modulators (MZM) which imprint the waveform in the carrier emitted by the transmitter laser diode. At the receiver the optical signal is mixed with the signal of a local oscillator laser diode at the four photodiodes which are differentially placed in two group, one detecting the real and the other the imaginary part of the signal. These signals are fed at the analog-to-digital (A/D) converters and pass through the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) module and after removing the guard interval, the subcarrier symbols and the corresponding output are estimated.   

Figure 3: The COWS link. S/P: serial-to-parallel, GI: guard interval, D/A: digital-to-analog converter, DFT: discrete Fourier transform, LPF: low pass filter, MZM: Mach Zenhder Modulator, PD: photodiode, LD: laser diode.

COWS Contribution to the current state-of-the-art.

The objective of COWS is to demonstrate the merits of optical coherent detection as a cornerstone of future wireless networks. More specifically, the project will advance the current state of the art in the following ways:

(a) Provide a proof-of-concept on the applicability of coherent detection in diffuse optical wireless systems in order to provide gigabit-per-second connectivity without the need of a direct optical path. This will constitute a reliable choice for next generation home networks, combining the high data rates of optical technologies and WiFi-like flexibility and mobility. The proof-of-concept entails experimental demonstration of several key aspects of the system. It should be noted that coherent detection has only been considered theoretically in line-of-sight indoor optical wireless systems assuming a flat channel [18]. As a consequence, COWS is expected to advance the state-of-the-art of optical wireless both on a theoretical and a numerical basis and in addition provide experimental validation.  

(b) Investigate suitable techniques for compensating multipath-induced distortion. Coherent optical frequency domain multiplexing (CO-OFDM) is a suitable choice for such applications since they can be implemented using DSP electronics. Other choices to be considered are distributed feedback equalization (DFE), linear equalization (LE) and frequency domain equalization (FDE). Bit loading at a subcarrier level can also increase the net transmission rate. The objective of COWS is to provide a systematic and thorough comparison of these techniques and analyze the pros and cons of each approach both on a performance and on an implementation cost level. These issues have not been addressed in the literature and are expected to provide a clear advancement in the current state of the art in the case of both diffuse and line of sight systems.

(c) Identify the best possible design for system implementation. The choice of LO laser type is of paramount importance since a low cost and low power technology such as vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) should be preferred. The receiving photodiode type is another important issue to consider, since although emphasis should be placed on low cost p-i-n diodes, silicon avalanche photodetectors (APD) should also be considered as they provide internal gain. The choice of the transmission wavelength is also an important matter, favoring the 800nm band where components are much cheaper. In choosing the right wavelength, certain eye-safety and skin-safety considerations should be taken into account however. Finally, the DSP circuit characteristics such as analog-to-digital sampling rate must be chosen wisely so as to keep the cost as low as possible. All these aspects have been previously considered in fiber-based systems, but given the cost sensitive nature of the application, the findings cannot be applied directly and can only serve as a starting guide.         

(d) Study the applicability of MIMO techniques in diffuse CO-OFDM systems in an attempt to provide increased capacity and coverage. Preliminary calculations show that this is a promising approach in line-of-sight coherent optical wireless links but the results need to be extended to include the intricacies of the diffuse wireless channel response and the use of multiple subcarrier modulation schemes such as OFDM. This is an exciting area of research and a terra incognita since little is actually known for the applicability of MIMO techniques is optical wireless.

[1]    http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/digital-agenda/daa/index_en.htm\

[2]    http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/events/cf/daa11/item-display.cfm?id=5998

[3]   http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/events/cf/daa11/item-display.cfm?id=5986

[4]     Lee et al IEEE J. Lightwave. Technol, vol 24, pp 4568-4583 (2006).

[5]     Rokkas et al, OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 2, pp. 1042-1051 (2010).

[6]     Yang et al, IEEE J. Lightwave Technology, Journal of , vol.28, pp.352-359 (2010)

[7]     Majumder et al, IEEE Potentials, vol.23, pp. 4- 8 (2004)

[8]     Juntunen et al, IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol.58, no.2, pp.348-355 (2010).

[9]     Baldwin et al, Electron. Lett.Vol. 48, Issue 10, p.536 (2012).

[10] Gfeller et al, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Communication, pp. 132-138 (1978)

 [11] Carruthers et al, IEEE Trans. on Commun. vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 960-969 (2000).

[12] Minh et al, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 22 (21), art. no. 5565407, pp. 1598-1600 (2010).

[13] Wang et al, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol.23, no.8, pp.519-521 (2011).

[14] Kazovsky, IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 5, 1095–1102 (1987).

[15] Ip et al, Opt. Express 16, 753-791 (2008).

[16] Hara et al, Multicarrier Techniques for 4G Mobile Communications, Artech House (2003).

[17] Roberts, Technical Digest, LEOS Summer Topical Meeting (IEEE), paper MA2.3 (2007). [18] Jafar et al, IET Communications, vol.2, no.1, pp.18-26 (2008).

[18]     Jafar et al, IET Communications, vol.2, no.1, pp.18-26 (2008).

                                                                


   Design by Free CSS Templatesa>.